Logo: TechTrax...brought to you by MouseTrax Computing Solutions

MS Photo Editor, Wherefore Art Thou?

by Herb Tyson, MVP and author of Word 2007 Bible

The Office 2003 “Upgrade” Surprise

I’m a creature of habit. Some folks might just stop at creature. But, they’re creatures of habit, too. But, I digress. In any case, part of my being a creature of habit is that when I get used to doing something one way, new ways can be unsettling. New ways can be especially irksome if they rob me of features I need.

So, when I installed Office 2003, imagine my surprise the first time I double-clicked a picture. Instead of seeing my trusty MS Photo Editor spring to life, the garish Microsoft Office Picture Manager (MOPM) took control, instead. The focus had changed from editing to management. The idea no longer was to edit a given picture. The idea was to manage a collection of them.

On the surface, the latter might not be a bad thing. I have tens of thousands of pictures, and some help in managing them might not be unwelcome. However, at the moment, I needed to create a .gif file with a transparent background for a web page, and I couldn’t find that capability in MOPM.

Sometimes less is more

So, I right-clicked, saw Edit Pictures, proclaimed Ah ha! and clicked. Hmmm. Not much there. So, I explored each and every editing option. I discovered that I could auto correct, fix red eye, compress, resize, crop, rotate… Gee, crop rotation. What next?

Not much, as it turns out. That turns out to be pretty much the full slate of MOPM’s menu of editing tools. Gone is MS Photo Editor's array of creative and amusing tools that can keep me entertained for hours. Gone, especially, is the ability to change background colors and convert a .jpg into a .gif with a transparent background.

However, if all you want to do is fix the colors and shrink a photo before putting it onto the web or sending it out to friends, then MOPM’s editing tools might actually serve you better than Photo Editor. A quick click on Auto Correct removes the mushiness. Choose the Export task pane, and choosing the correct size for the web is a bit more straightforward than trying to guess what size you need using Photo Editor.

Another cool trick is the ability to work with multiple pictures at once. Choose Thumbnail or Filmstrip View, select half a dozen pictures, click Auto Correct. Hey! It fixed all of them at the same time! It can also flip a bunch of pictures at the same time. I might actually have some use for MOPM!

Once you’ve made changes, when you go to close MOPM, it shows you all of the changed pictures and asks if you want to save the changes. Thank goodness it didn’t just write the changes to disk without asking!

But, despite searching through the entire interface, on some scores, MOPM comes up seriously short of some features and capabilities, such as the ability to smudge, sharpen or set a transparent color. The latter is useful when you want to create a .gif with a transparent background for a web page, or for another application when you don’t want an annoying rectangle showing up.

MOPM also lacks Photo Editor’s rich array of Effects, which can help you turn just about any photo into a work of art. Watercolor and Stained Glass are especially useful in creating artistic effects. Lacking any of Monet’s impressionistic talent, Photo Editor fills that gap by letting me turn a city or country landscape into collage of colors that comes into focus only as you step away from it.

So, despite MOPM’s obvious utility for performing some tasks, I knew that doing without Photo Editor was too much to ask.

So, I went searching for Photo Editor. Surely, I thought, Office 2003 wouldn’t have removed that useful tool. Surely, it’s simply added this additional tool. Microsoft can’t possibly believe that MOPM is a full replacement for Photo Editor.

Apparently, they can. Not only wasn’t Photo Editor my default anymore, it had left the building entirely.

Add Photo Editor back

The first question to enter my mind was: Is there a compatibility problem? Perhaps Microsoft removed Photo Editor because it didn’t work with Office 2003. Nope. True, it’s not at all integrated into the framework of Office 2003. But, then again, neither really is MOPM. But, Photo Editor can and does work fine side by side with Office 2003, as well as with MOPM. The two in concert/tandem can make for a pretty good set of picture editing and management tools.

I dug through my stack of CDs, fished out my Office XP CD, inserted it, navigated to MS Photo Editor, and reinstalled it. I also needed to retain access to Word XP, so I had told Office 2003 to leave it in place. So, a number of Office XP features were already still on my system.

If you left any vestiges of Office XP on your system, choose Start – Settings – Control Panel – Add or Remove Programs – Microsoft Office XP – Change – Add or Remove… - Next. Microsoft Photo Editor is listed under Office Tools. You’ll be prompted to insert the CD at the appropriate time.

If you didn’t leave any of Office XP on your system, then you’ll need to insert the Office XP CD, and ultimately navigate to the same location.

After monkeying with XP setup, you might find that the next time your run an Office 2003 program, it might tell you that it’s installing something. Feed it the Office 2003 CD if prompted. Don’t worry. It just needs to grab a few files that XP rudely overwrote.

Once you’ve reinstalled Photo Editor, when you right-click a supported graphic, the Open With choices should now include Microsoft Photo Editor. If setup reset Photo Editor as the default, and if you don’t want it to be the default, you can reestablish MOPM as the default. In Windows Explorer, right-click on a file whose Open behavior you want to change. Choose Open With, then Choose Program. In the Open With dialog box, select the program you want to use (e.g., Microsoft Office Picture Manager), click to enable the Always use the selected program to open this kind of file, and click OK. Or, if reinstalling Microsoft Photo Editor doesn’t reinstated it as the default, you can use the Open With…Chose Program trick to do it.

So, why would I need to create a picture with a transparent background? If you look to the previous paragraph, I think you’ll find the reason to be somewhat transparent. And, yes. You have just been mooned.

 

Go up to the top of this page.

This site powered by the Logical Web Publisher (TM): Fast, easy, and affordable content management